Taron Egerton is the Next Great Movie Star

Taron Egerton is worth making out to the cinemaplex

My wife and I took our kids to see the movie "Sing" this past weekend. I'm not going to review the movie because I only saw half of it, my one year old was throwing a fit, so I had to walk around the hallways of the theater with her after the first 40 minutes of the movie. But, from what I did see, the movie looked cute, it seemed fun and the voice acting and singing was really decent. Reese Witherspoon was good, Tori Kelly was exceptional, Seth Mcfarlane was very good, Scarlett Johansson was good and Matthew Mccounaghy was pretty funny.

The person that struck me the most in the movie was Taron Egerton. He played Johnny, the English gorilla, and he was dynamite. I did not know that he could sing like that, but man does that dude have some pipes. This got me thinking, and I realized that everything I have seen Taron Egerton in, I have really enjoyed the movie, but more importantly, his performances in these movies. That is what I will be writing about today, the awesomeness that is Taron Egerton.

Taron Egerton is a young actor, 27, so hopefully we get a lot more from him, which I'm sure we will, but his short list of performances is pretty incredible. As I have already said, from what I saw in "Sing", he was the standout. He played the teenage gorilla that did not want to be a criminal, but rather a performer, really well. I bought his voice acting. I believed that he wanted to leave his life of crime behind and become a singer and a stage performer. He was really good. His cover over of the excellent Sam Smith song, "Stay With Me", was really, really good. Even when his character hit the wrong notes on the piano, Egerton's singing was on point. He was great.

So, this performance got me thinking about some of the other movies I have seen him in, and how much I liked those performances. He played the titular Eddie in last year's "Eddie and the Eagle". This movie looked like schmaltzy garbage when I saw the preview, but it was on cable a month or so ago and I watched the last half of it, and Egerton was great. He played this odd kid that wanted to be an Olympic skier. He was really excellent as Eddie. Hugh Jackman was listed as the star, or first billed, in the movie, but it was really Egerton, playing the lead role, that was the star of the movie. He took this sweet story of a kid trying to make it in a sport that he had no business being involved with and he made it believable. Yes, the movie has cliché scenes of making it, then not making it, a coach believing, then not believing, all the typical stuff in a movie like this, but Egerton played it with no fluff or schmaltz, and I loved that. He made this movie not only watchable, but very enjoyable. I would have never seen it had Egerton not been in it, and if it was not on cable, but I'm glad I watched the last half because it was pretty good.

Another movie that I recently saw, and have talked about on the podcast before, "Legend", gives us a very good performance from Egerton. It is a smaller role, but it is very memorable. "Legend" is an okay movie. Tom Hardy plays twin gangsters in 1960's London, and the movie is ripe with gangster clichés, but Hardy's performance and Egerton's small performance make this movie. Hardy plays the brothers, one of which is a suave and sleek go getter and the other is a gay, ass kicking, mean son of a bitch. Hardy is great at these dual roles. Egerton plays one of the ass kicking brothers friends/boyfriends in this movie. He is the one person that the ass kicking brother actually listens to and takes his words to heart. Egerton is really good in this role, which is pretty different from anything he has done so far. He is very flamboyant, but he is a tough guy too. He laughs and joins in anytime the ass kicking brother beats the hell out of someone for taking money, not paying debts or anything that sets the brother off. There is a great scene near the end where you can see legitimate worry on Egerton's face because he realizes that he loves this man, but he cannot do anything for him, because he is mentally unstable, and he realizes that he fed into his mental illness by joining in on everything that he wanted him to do. It is heartbreaking, and Egerton pulls it off. Like I said, "Legend" isn't great, but it isn't bad either and that is due to Hardy and Egerton's performances. The fact that he can trade acting blows with Tom Hardy should speak volumes to his acting prowess.

The movie that introduced me to the greatness that is Taron Egerton was "Kingsman: The Secret Service". I have written about this movie on the site already, but I didn't point out enough how awesome Egerton is in the movie. He is incredible. He is the star. He is hardcore in "Kingsman". He plays a punk turned spy so incredibly. His transformation that happens during "Kingsman" is so great. He becomes the spy that Colin Firth wanted him to become. He is so badass in the movie. The one scene where he punches the glass door so he and all the other recruits can survive a surprise test is super cool. The final fight scene between Egerton, the woman with blades as legs and Samuel L Jackson is one of the most incredible things I have seen in a movie in a long time. If you want to see a primo Egerton performance, watch "Kingsman". That is the cream of the crop, and the best thing he has done so far. There is a sequel coming out for "Kingsman", and I cannot wait to see it, mainly to see how great Taron Egerton is in it.

He has done a few other things that I have not seen yet, but I'm sure he is great in those as he has been great in everything I have seen him in. He has a few other things he is working on right now as well. I think that we need to start looking at Taron Egerton as a guy that is on the verge of stardom. He has been great in all the movies and television he has been in so far, and I only see him trending upward. This dude is a great actor, and I just wanted to point that out today. Taron Egerton is going to be a star.

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast. He likes great movies and great football. Listen to his thoughts about the year in football on the latest X Millennial Man Podcast. Follow Ty on instagram and twitter.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Let's make the Olympic Games Great Again

Every four years, this should be the most interesting field of play

SeedSing is proud to offer voices from all over the globe. Today we present a guest post from Olympic enthusiast and top notch idea man Jon C. Get your ideas heard by writing for SeedSing

I love the Olympics. I very clearly remember watching the primetime coverage with my parents when I was a young child. I remember Carl Lewis sprinting and jumping to 9 gold medals, Eddie the Eagle plunging down the 90-meter ski jump at 60 mph and sticking the landing, and Michael Johnson wearing his golden shoes to the 200 and 400 meter gold medals. Even today I watch about 16 hours of coverage each day during the Olympic fortnight.

As one of the biggest fans of the Olympics, I believe I’ve earned the right to speak out on my biggest criticism of the world’s greatest sporting event. The Olympics should only include sports where winning the gold medal is the pinnacle of the sport. Compare the Wikipedia pages of Andre Agassi and Michael Phelps. Agassi’s page prominently lists his Grand Slam record, then other tournaments, and the last entry is his gold medal win in singles. Michael Phelps’s page prominently displays his Olympic record before all the other championships. Did you know Roger Federer has an Olympic gold medal in doubles? No, you didn’t, because nobody cares. The Olympics is cheapened by the inclusion of sports where the Olympics just becomes an optional part of the summer circuit.  This is evident by the number of professional golfers that decided to skip the Olympics with the cop-out over concerns about the Zika virus.

The inclusion of a sport to the Olympics should be based on the following simple poll question to the competitors:  What international competition would you most prefer to win? Professional soccer players would prefer to win the World Cup, tennis players Wimbledon or the other majors, and for golfers the Masters or British Open, but far down on the list is the Olympics. I include the phrase “international competition” because the NBA Championships and the Stanley Cup present a gray area where athletes from around the world would pick a national championship as the preferred event. Hockey is an iconic Olympic event and must be included. International interest and participation in the NBA has made Olympic basketball a staple.

The Olympics are for athletes that dedicate themselves to sports that are interesting to watch once every four years. I get really excited about watching bobsled, rowing, and weightlifting, but that enthusiasm can’t be maintained year after year. That’s what is so great about the Olympics; it doesn’t outstay it’s welcome. After watching 2 days of bobsled, the amount of time it takes for me to be excited to watch it again is about four years. The Olympics are also for quirky sports like handball, which I can only imagine was invented by a bored Danish gym teacher that had a couple lacrosse goals, a volleyball and came up with a game where no one except the goalie can be inside the basketball three point line. But the games are fun and close-scoring, and it doesn’t take long before you start yelling at your TV, “Feed the pivot, feed the pivot!”

The Olympic games don’t need superstars like Rory McIlroy or Serena Williams to make it relevant, the Olympics makes its own superstars like Usain Bolt. Serena gets to shine four times a year. Over the next two weeks lets focus on the athletes that only get to shine once every four years.

Jon C

About the Author:

Jon C. used to be cool and drive a V8 Audi. Now he drives a mini-van and is not cool.