ESPN's Lakers Bias is Strong

Yesterday I wrote about the Luka-AD trade. I put out my thoughts on the whole thing. I figure both teams got some good and bad out of the whole deal. It's still odd to think about, but with press conferences and it all being official, we just have to see them play now for my eyes to fully believe it. But the reason I'm back today to talk about it one more time is all the stuff I read about this trade and the grades given out by supposed experts.

ESPN is usually the first site that gives out their grades from their writers. Other publications and sites follow up right away, but I usually only read ESPN. I don't like their content, but it's the quickest and it's the first one I tend to see. The Jazz, who I totally forgot were part of this deal, got a B. The Lakers were given an A. And the Mavs, a stone cold F.

I was a little stunned when I saw this. The Jazz grade didn't do much for me. Sure, they got a player, Jalen Hood Schifino, and some picks. That's what they want right now. The more picks the Jazz get, the better for them. And if a team can throw in a young, unproven player, they will most definitely give that person a shot. A B for them makes total sense to me. But the A for the Lakers and F for the Mavs is wild. The Lakers defense was already struggling with their best defender, AD. They were in the 20's. That's not great. LeBron can only do so much, as he is getting older. Jarred Vanderbilt struggles to stay healthy enough during the regular season, and has become borderline unplayable in the playoffs. Austin Reaves is a total zero on that end. Gabe Vincent seems like a one season wonder. Jaxson Hayes has never lived up to the high draft position. Dalton Knecht is not ready to play mid level NBA defense. Bronny James goes back and forth between the NBA and G League. Adding Luka Doncic will do good things for their offense, but he is going to pull this defense down even further. I saw a video of him "playing defense" the other night and it was abhorrent. His footwork is atrocious. He gets beat with ease. He is always calling and pointing for help. He cannot even keep guards out of the post anymore. This squad reminds me of a team that just wants to outscore everyone, but that will not happen. So, to give them an A is wild to me. I have to imagine it's because everyone at ESPN is in love with Doncic for some reason. They look past his poor defense and consistent whining. They only see the wild shots that fall and they have let everything else fly. That's irresponsible for a major network like them, but here we are. They will give a pass to anyone they seem to have a crush on.

An F for the Mavs is rough too. The love ESPN seems to have for Doncic, that is the same amount of hate and disdain they have for AD. They question everything that he does. They complain that he's "not as dominant" as he should be. They always talk about him being hurt. They mock his jumper. I don't get it. AD does get hurt and his jumper is gone, but the other stuff is nonsense. AD, when he plays, is very good. He is an upper tier low post defender. He can rebound the ball. He gets to the line a ton. He seems to be a solid teammate. And he's in shape. AD is a very good basketball player. He is one of the top forwards/centers in the league. When he plays, no matter what teams he is on, they seem to play well enough to be a thorn. While the trade may not be for everyone, an F seems like a wild overreach from the writers at ESPN. I just don't see how they can go to two different extremes when talking about two players in their prime. There has to be something else to this, but I cannot figure it out.

I don't agree or think these grades are fair or reliable. But, it figures a company like ESPN is only in it for the stars that they love, and clearly Anthony Davis is not one of them. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.