FAFO: A Growth Mindset Approach

Lately, "FAFO" (short for "F*** Around and Find Out") has been making its rounds as a phrase of warning—usually implying that reckless actions lead to negative consequences. But I see it differently. To me, FAFO isn’t just about cause and effect; it’s a way of life. It’s about exploration, questioning, and engaging with the world in a way that leads to greater understanding. It’s about embracing a growth mindset.

To FAFO is to be curious. It means testing boundaries, experimenting with ideas, and learning from both success and failure. It acknowledges that sometimes we will stumble, but every experience—good or bad—brings insight. Instead of seeing consequences as something to avoid, this perspective frames them as lessons, stepping stones toward a deeper understanding of ourselves and our reality.

The alternative is stagnation. If we never question, never try, never push past comfort zones, we never truly grow. FAFO encourages movement, action, and participation in the world rather than passive acceptance. It’s not just about recklessness; it’s about engaging with life on your own terms, knowing that every step forward (or sideways, or even backward) is part of the journey.

Some of the most important personal growth in my life has come from FAFO moments—times when I challenged assumptions, took risks, or simply refused to accept things as they were. Sometimes it worked out beautifully. Sometimes it didn’t. But in every case, I found out more about myself, the people around me, and the way the world works. And to me, that’s invaluable.

So, I’d like to reclaim FAFO as more than just a cautionary phrase. Let’s make it a mantra for curiosity, for pushing boundaries, for embracing the unknown. Because if we don’t f*** around, we’ll never truly find out.

Kirk Aug

Kirk is a writer, beekeeper and a fellow traveller on spaceship Earth. Follow Kirk on instagram @kirkaug

Thoughts on the Wembanyama Season Ending Injury

It was announced a few days ago that Spurs unicorn Victor Wembanyama is going to miss the rest of the NBA season due to a blood clot in his shoulder. Let’s discuss.

When I first saw the news it bummed me out. I also had the fleeting thought of, is this just the start of an injury riddled what could have been a type of career for him. Wemby is unlike any NBA player I have ever watched. He is gigantic. He stands at 7'4 and he looks every bit of it. He is an intimidating interior defender already. He can block shots out on the perimeter in a split second. He was going to win his first DPOY this season. He can dribble like a guard. He can shoot threes. He is quick. He was getting better playing in the low post. He announced himself during his rookie season, he struck fear in everyone who watched him in the summer Olympics and he was coming off his first all star appearance. He did all of this, and has all these skills, before he is even close to his prime. Wemby's best days are yet to come. But now he has this blood clot injury.

I didn't know what to make of it at first, but then I saw someone say this was the same thing that Chris Bosh dealt with near the end of his career. Bosh was never the same player after his injury. But, Bosh had a full career up to that point. He was an all star, a champ, a player of note in the NBA. No disrespect to Bosh, but Wemby has loftier goals and he was, and he can still be, on his way to being the face of the NBA post LeBron James. Now, who knows what is going to happen to him and the Spurs. The Spurs were not going to be a real threat this season, but they were on their way to fighting for a play-in spot in the West, which is going to be a tough get by the end of the season. Wemby was starting to really excel in spots that some thought might be a struggle for him. He was becoming this incredible defender. He was scoring everywhere on the floor. He was making his name for himself in the league and carving out his spot as the guy. He was playing better with a real point guard in Chris Paul. The Spurs went out and got De'Aaron Fox in one of the better trades of the past decade. The other young guys the Spurs have been drafting were figuring out their role with Wemby as the star player and focal point of the offense and defense. This whole experiment post Tim Duncan was starting to come together for them. And now they are without the guy that makes the engine run.

I see no real good out of this other than the fact that Stephon Castle, who is awesome already, will get more run and more shots. This is going to slow down the progress the Spurs were hoping to capitalize on soon. The Spurs sit a few games below .500 now, and with Wemby out who knows how far they'll fall. But I think they already have too many wins to have a real shot at drafting any of the big name prospects in the upcoming draft. But what makes injury so much of a bummer for me, as an NBA fan, I was watching a ton of Spurs games because I want to watch Wemby as much as possible. He is a gift to basketball fans. He is so unique. He is the first of his kind. He makes the game of basketball fun. He makes the game of basketball effortless when he plays, and that is a joy to watch.

This is a bummer. This is not what the NBA needs coming off another bad all star weekend. I hope it doesn't affect the long term in Wemby's career. That would stink for the NBA, but more so, for Wemby.

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

Ty Reads "Joyful Recollections of Trauma"

I'm just about done reading Paul Scheer's book, "Joyful Recollections of Trauma". I remember him talking about the book on podcast appearances. I remember reading about it online. I saw some other people talking about it on tv and other podcast appearances. But, I hadn't bought it or read it at that point. Then it was gifted to me over the holidays, and about two weeks ago I decided it was time to read. I wanted to get off my phone, and reading a book felt like the best way.

I'm very happy that this was the book I decided to go with. I have really enjoyed reading it. I have heard some of the stories that he wrote about on podcasts, but to get even more in depth, and to hear how he is now dealing with them all as an adult, it is great. And some of these stories can get pretty rough, but Scheer always finds a way to undercut them with humor. Scheer is a funny guy. He always makes me laugh during his podcasts, and when he shows up on a tv show I like, I know he is going to make it even funnier. He has a great way to turn almost any situation into something humorous and enjoyable. So, when he goes into a story in his book about his abusive former stepfather or how his parents leave out major details of stories or when he got engaged or the feelings he had when he first had kids, it always ends with some kind of joke or humorous quip. He goes into great detail about these stories from his past, and while I find myself feeling bad for him, and I still do by the end of the story, he finds a great way to cut the tension. It makes for a nice read. Scheer really seems to know himself and he is finding himself being able to deal with his past. And he is now letting us all in on some of these life altering moments. I respect that. I don't know if I could do something like that, but I appreciate when someone can and Scheer excels here. I also like that he has the support and confidence from his partner, his kids, his friends and his parents to go into this much detail. They left no stone unturned. Even when a celeb's name is blacked out, I understand that people who work in Hollywood don't want to unwillingly call someone out if they don't want their name dragged through the mud. And when he is able to name names, it is pretty great to see how some of his friends used to act. But, in the end, Scheer is not here to talk poorly about anyone. He always has disclaimers about anyone he is talking about. He wants the reader to know that this is his story and his story alone. Scheer has invited us into his world and I'm forever grateful to him for that. There are even some stories in this book that I can relate to both personally and through friends and family.

"Joyful Recollections of Trauma" is a very, very good book. It's a bit over 260 pages, which isn't that long. So, if you're a slow reader like me, a book like this is perfect. And, if you want to read about real life stuff in a very good and funny book, read this book. I highly recommend it. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

"Scott Hasn't Seen" and "Cobra Kai" Create Podcasting Heaven

One of my favorite podcasts to listen to is "Scott Hasn't Seen". It's part of the Patreon attached to "Comedy Bang! Bang!". I'm a patron and "Scott Hasn't Seen" has quickly rocketed its way up for me. I look forward to a new episode every Friday. This past week I noticed they were doing their final installment of "Cobra Kai".

I have only ever watched one episode of that show, the series premiere. It wasn't for me. I was a little late to "Karate Kid", I've never seen the movies that followed and I only first tuned into "Cobra Kai" because RD, who is a fan, told me to check it out. I get why he likes it, but I just couldn't get into it. But, for some unknown reason, every time Scott Aukerman, Shaun Diston as Sprague the Whisperer and Conor Ratliff are doing a podcast about the show, I devour it. I prefer to hear them talk about the show rather than watching it myself. I like the way they analyze it and joke about it. And ever since Ratliff's first appearance on the show, they have this whole idea that "Cobra Kai" was going to blend in elements from "The Next Karate Kid". They have gone so far as to call themselves "Next Heads", claiming to be the biggest fans of "The Next Karate Kid",.

A little backstory that may be needed, the first time Scott Aukerman watched "The Next Karate Kid", he hated it. He went so far as to tell Ratliff to f off. He was joking, but you could hear that he truly hated that movie. But in the course of that episode, Ratliff got Aukerman on his side. He convinced him that "The Next Karate Kid" was this gem of a movie and the whole idea of being "Next Heads" was born. Shaun Diston, it seemed, was already on board, so he needed no convincing. Since that appearance, whenever they get together to do their series on "Cobra Kai", they have been begging for the creators to add some elements from "The Next Karate Kid" into the final episodes of the series. And it all came to a head in this five hour long episode. You read that right. They did a watchalong where they watched the last five episodes, hoping to see elements from "The Next Karate Kid" sprinkled in, and talked about each episode as they were happening.

Again, I'm not a fan of this show, and a five hour podcast runtime seemed tough, but I couldn't get enough from these three. I was on the edge of my seat waiting for something, anything for them to glomb onto and run with. I wanted it to happen for them. They never really lost faith until it got close to the end, and I don't think that is any kind of spoiler for fans of "Cobra Kai". But, their constant need for them to add any kind of element made for one hell of a listen. I was there along with them the whole ride. I loved hearing them analyze each episode as it was happening. Anytime a shadowy figure would appear, they'd get excited. Anytime someone said something, an example from the episode is the word "alpha", they jumped on it and went on long tangents about how this could be the creators way of putting "The Next Karate Kid" into the world of "Cobra Kai". It was awesome and funny and had me on the edge of my seat while listening. I also took time listening to the episode. It took me about three days to listen to it in its entirety. And it was incredible.

This is the type of watchalong show I enjoy hearing and want more of these. When you get really funny people to commit to something as big as this, it is going to hit for me. I recommend listening to this episode of "Scott Hasn't Seen" if you are anyway interested in "Cobra Kai". It's fascinating and fun. Just know, it's five hours and it takes time. But it is totally worth it.  

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches "Sly Lives"

I'm currently finishing the new Hulu documentary, "Sly Lives". Let’s discuss.

I am a Sly and the Family Stone fan. I was introduced to their music a long time ago by my dad. I'm sure at the time of him playing it for me I got nothing out of it. I bet I just figured that my dad was showing me "old" music he liked. But, as I got older, and more into music, I heard more and more artists I liked talking about their music or covering songs at shows. I was intrigued. I asked my dad about it and I'm sure he informed me that he had played his music for me in the past. But, since other artists I liked were now talking about it to me, I wanted more. I started to dive deeper and deeper. I knew "Everyday People", "Thankyoufalettinmebemiceelf" and "Dance to the Music". But as I searched more and more into their catalog, I found more stuff I liked. Songs like "Family Affair", "If You Want Me to Stay", "Hot Fun in the Summertime", and so on and so forth. I dug the music because it was funky and I could bop my head along to it. I never really paid full attention to the music until I got even older. I would then, and still do now, listen to the lyrics and realize that Sly Stone had something important to say. He used his talent to talk about what was going on in the world. I realized that he had this vision for the world and I agreed with his vision. It also helped that his band was made up of black and white people and boys and girls. He wanted input from everyone. Sly didn't see color, he saw music. I love that.

The documentary tells you about all of this and tells it great. They have some very influential and important people talking about his genius. Questlove directed the movie, and with this and his last doc, "Summer of Soul", I feel like he has cornered the market on docs about funk and soul music from the 60's and 70's. He knows the topic and knows it well and he puts that out there on full blast. I love it. He was able to secure interviews with former band members, D'Angelo, Andre 3000, Nile Rodgers, Chaka Khan and Q-Tip, to name a few. To hear these heavy hitters talk about Sly Stone was amazing. Of course they talk about the music, but they also talk about so much more. I didn't realize how deep and connected people are to Sly Stone. I had no idea he was a producer and DJ before he was a renowned musician. I was floored when I realized he produced "Somebody to Love". I didn't know he came up in the church and later used that in his music. His family, when he was a child, was very important to his development as an artist. I didn't realize the drug issue stuff. I knew a bit about it, but didn't know how rough it truly was. The performance from Woodstock was eye opening. Questlove was able to get these videos of performances and interviews that were amazing for a fan like me to see for the first time.

I love this movie. If you know any little thing about Sly and the Family Stone, if you know one song, this movie is required viewing. I cannot recommend "Sly Lives" enough. It is instantly on my shortlist for best movies of 2025 already. "Sly Lives" is incredible. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

NBA All-Star Weekend is a Waste of Everyone's Time

It seems I'm at somewhat of a crossroads with the NBA.

I adore the game of basketball. It was my favorite sport to play when I was younger. I played it as long as my knees would let me. I coach my son now because I want to stay attached to this game anyway I can. I also love watching basketball. Let me clarify that, I love watching college and NBA basketball. And, while college basketball was kind of hit and miss the past couple years, I've gotten back into it big time this season. It helps that my 13 year old is interested. We watch games together a ton now. When it comes to the NBA, I have found myself checking out more often than in. I am an old school fan. I don't like all the threes being shot. I liked it more when players had real hatred towards one another. I wanted to see these dudes really go at it during a game. I will always prefer a big dunk to a long three. I adored players like Michael Jordan and Allen Iverson based purely on their will to get to the basket and to not settle on jumpers.

All of that has changed.

I will say, players today are far more athletic than players from the 90's. The things these current players can do, some on both ends of the floor, is amazing. But, I personally feel that the game is softer and not as cutthroat. And I get that some people prefer this style of play. It just isn't for me.

For the last few years, the all star game and weekend have been truly abysmal. It is no fun to watch for me anymore. The dunk contest is totally watered down. No stars do it anymore. There was a time when Jordan and Dr J would sign up for the dunk contest. Aaron Gordon and Zach Lavine gave us some of the best dunks I've ever witnessed. Vince Carter returned the dunk contest back to its glory in the early 2000's. Now, we get rookies who get zero run during regular season games, or G League guys that are essentially a side show. Sure, Mac McClung is a great leaper, but he will never play a meaningful second in a real NBA game. I am a big Stephon Castle fan, but he is a rookie on a Spurs team that features Wemby. These guys are better than I could ever dream of being at the game of basketball, but they aren't Ja Morant or Anthony Edwards. The dunk contest is craving for star power. The 3 point contest is okay, but it's just a shooting contest, and almost every NBA player can shoot threes. This one has no issue getting stars because there's no worry of injury. But, when Dame or Steph are done after one round, I stop watching. The skills competition needs to go away, as does the "celebrity" all star game.

The worst part of the whole weekend is the game. It is nothing more than an offensive scrimmage. No one even attempts defense. Guys take threes from halfcourt. There's a million jumpers hoisted constanty. The NBA all star game is as bad, if not worse, than the NFL pro bowl. And this whole "tournament" thing they did last night, from what I've read, seems like a real whiff. I don't get why they decided to split the all stars into a bunch of different teams and have the rookie and sophomore teams involved as well. That is a waste of time.

The biggest thing I took away from the weekend, and why I feel at a crossroads with the NBA, I didn't watch a single second of all star weekend. I didn't check in at all. I have not looked at any highlights. I know Steph was the MVP, but I couldn't tell you a single thing he actually did in the game. I used to watch something every all star weekend. I used to watch a snippet of every event. But this year I had no interest or desire. I guess I'm over all star weekend. I saw that Kevin Durant was saying that, if the game is so bad to the fans, to give the players a week off. I know he was being passive aggressive, but that is a much better idea and way less of a waste of time for the players. I would love it if they did that instead of playing a pointless, defenseless basketball game that hardly anyone cares about. I don't know. But, the one thing I do know, the NBA needs to make some drastic changes to all star weekend. It has reached the point of being unwatchable. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

We Need To Talk More About the Great "Brooklyn 99"

We like to watch tv in our bed as we fall asleep in my home. My wife and I don't let our kids do it yet, but I'm sure it will happen sometime in the near future. My wife and I switch after we finish whichever show we picked. It was my turn to pick recently and I chose "Brooklyn 99".

This is, what seems like, our hundredth time watching this show. We both like it and it is good to fall asleep to. It lulls me into a near sleep space and I can just drift off. But, I have noticed one thing since the rewatch started a week ago. I have started to stay awake a little longer than normal watching it. I want to see each episode again, and may I remind you, I've seen this series many, many times. I want to see if I missed something. I want to relive jokes. I want to see if some stuff comes together better than it did before.

What has really made me stay up longer, this is one of the best shows in the history of television, and I feel like it doesn't get the love it truly deserves.  It has its true fans. There is an online presence, that much is for sure. But when websites make their best of all time tv lists, or talk about the best tv from the 21st century, "Brooklyn 99" never seems to come up. You get the usual suspects, "Breaking Bad", "The Wire", "Lost" and "Parks and Rec", all of which are wonderful tv shows. But "Brooklyn 99" even gets passed up when they narrow the list to best comedies. I don't get it. This show was so well written. It is joke after joke after joke. I find myself cracking up constantly. The delivery is too perfect. And each actor knows how to perform as their characters. Andy Samberg gets to play himself, and he nails it. He is so funny and so witty. He has some of the best jokes on the show. Stephanie Beatriz gets to play someone totally different, and she crushes it. She is brash and harsh, but she also has a soft side. I love how tough she can be, and when she really leans into the joke, it is wonderful. Melissa Fumero shines as the dorky one in the precinct. She's a nerd and she knows it and owns it. She is too funny. Joe Lo Truglio is sweet and naive and he's great. I feel like this show let his best comedic ways shine. He gets to have fun and it shows on screen. Chelesa Peretti made the most of her time while she was there. She was rude and crude and had some of the best one liners. But the one that goes above and beyond, and made the show as awesome as it was, Andre Braugher. He is the straight man on the show and he is perfect. His delivery, his tone, the robotic jokes that happen nearly every episode, it is masterful. When Jake calls him dad for the first time, the way Braugher plays into it, it is one of the best comedic performances in television history.

Mike Schur has this way with comedic tv. He knows how to write it, he hires the best staff, he gives unknown writers their first real shot and he lets his staff do the brunt of the work. And it always comes out smelling like roses. From "The Office" to "Parks and Rec", "The Good Place" and his time at "SNL", the guy knows how to make comedy work on tv and he truly shines when he is the head writer and in charge in the room. But I have come away even more impressed with the work he and his staff did on "Brooklyn 99". I truly believe it is the best work he has done to this day. The show works, it is endlessly watchable and it is so damn funny. I wanted to give it a shout out because I feel like it deserves even more love and recognition. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches "Cunk on Life"

A week or so back I wrote about the character Philomena Cunk, played by Diane Morgan. I adore this character. I loved "Cunk on Earth". It is one of the funnier series I've watched on Netflix. I wanted more Cunk material, and Netflix recently released "Cunk on Life", a 70 minute long documentary that is very similar, if not the same, as "Cunk on Earth".

This time around it was one long extended episode masquerading as a movie. It started the same and had the same vibe to it. But, after 22 minutes, the documentary just kept going, and I loved it. This is one of the best short movies to come out in 2025. Like I said, it has all the elements of the show that I like, it's just an extended version. They still did chapters, but with each new chapter the movie kept going. Cunk was there asking her questions, as straightforward as possible, and the experts were trying to answer them to the best of their ability. And these questions were riotous. When she talks to the sex expert, and the faces she makes and the stuff she says about her ex, I was howling. When she is looking at paintings and talking about how much she dislikes them, and then asking a question to the expert, who we don't know is on screen until they're spoken to, genius. When she goes on and on calling DNA d and a, and the expert has to constantly correct her, that was a dynamite bit. And some of the scenes that she had actors come on and shoot that seemingly lasted forever, I'm thinking of Thomas Hubble and his wife being intimate, it was the best kind of squirming in my chair humor. All along though, and the thing I adore about Cunk, she kept a straight face. She never broke. She has to know that what she is saying ois outrageous, but she just plows ahead, and it is all the better for it.

I really loved this movie. My only true gripe is that I wanted it to be longer, but that isn't the British way when it comes to content. I feel like they just want to give you a tiny little taste, and then have you begging for more. And I like that. I don't always need my appetite to be sated by shows and movies. I can sit and think about all the hilarious stuff Philomena Cunk can do in the future. And Diane Morgan may very well be done with this character. Maybe this was the last we will see of Philomena. And if that's the case, what a way to go. I mean, she has cornered the market on cringe interviews. She has surpassed Ali G. She is better than anyone at "The Daily Show", which is a show I also adore. She does this better than anyone in the game. I do hope this doesn't pigeonhole her, but there are much worse outcomes for someone who works in television and movies.

"Cunk on Life" is brilliant and a must watch for fans of her work. I was late to Morgan's stuff as Cunk, but I'm glad I found it and was told by friends and family to watch. Watch this movie, but also watch her other work. Morgan is one of the better minds working in comedy tv and movies right now, and "Cunk on Earth" and "Cunk on Life" more than prove that. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Better Never Than Late on "Venom: The Last Dance"

My wife and I watched "Venom: The Last Dance" over the weekend.

Oh boy.

A while back I wrote about how I enjoyed the first movie in the Tom Hardy "Venom" universe. That movie understood what it was supposed to be. It was silly. The relationship between Eddie Brock and Venom was one of the better love stories I've seen in a long time. The action sequences weren't great, but they were fun because everyone involved was in on the joke. I kept watching it and saying that I didn't know why, but I liked the movie. We watched the first movie again when we were in Mexico a few months ago, and it was then when it dawned on me that the first "Venom" movie is a perfect, lazy day on vacation movie. It lives in the background, you check it out for a minute or two and then you go back to relaxing. We did watch the second movie, but that one was too violent and too scary. They went for as much gore as a PG-13 movie could go for. The Eddie Brock and Venom duo wasn't as great, they wasted Woody Harrelson and the stuff with Michelle Williams just didn't hit. I was kind of bummed afterward because they went in a totally different direction. It had the opposite effect that the "Thor" movies had. Those movies shifted to more comedy where this movie shifted to violence.

But, with the third installment being called "The Last Dance", it piqued my interest. I was hoping that they'd go back to trying comedy and focusing a bit more on Brock and Venom. Well, this movie took a third tonal shift, and for me, it fell flat. This time they tried to go sentimental. This, for me, is not what this story should be. I wished they'd gone back to having fun and goofing around. I thought they would go for broke and make joke after joke after joke. They did not. I will say, they definitely spent more time on Brock and Venom's relationship. Those two were talking back and forth the entire time they were on screen. They worked on their relationship so much that they ended the movie with a montage from the previous movies. But, the way they spoke to one another was corny as hell. There was one scene where Venom turned into a horse, made Eddie ride him, and as they were going faster and faster, Venom said, "now that's what I call horsepower". That is some low level writing in my opinion. And this continued time and again. They got big name actors and barely used them. Juno Temple is onscreen for maybe five minutes. Chiwetel Ejiofor is there for a little longer, maybe ten minutes, and he is a cliched former army veteran. Rhys Ifans plays a hippy and it is not so great. They got all these great British actors to play Americans, and while they could've made jokes about that, they chose not to, which bummed me out. The action sequences were dull and boring. You get so many symbiotes in this movie, which should have been awesome, and they came and went far too fast. And the final scene between Venom and Eddie Brock, where they really tried to tug at the heartstrings, was not very good. You could see where it was going from the start, and to have one of them sacrifice themselves, I was not a fan.

I guess I'm happy that I get to watch the first one anytime I want. That movie will hold a special place for me. But I wish the people involved stuck with the goofiness. Three genre changes just simply didn't work. Maybe Tom Hardy had enough and was ready to be done with this role. I don't know, but "The Last Dance" was not as good as it could have been for me. Oh well. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches Super Bowl LIX

The Eagles dominated Super Bowl 59 last night. Let’s discuss.

It was a wire to wire win for the Eagles. They didn’t trail for one second. There was never a moment where it looked in peril. The only thing the Chiefs did even remotely well was stop the run. But, it seemed like they were solely focused on Saquon Barkley, and that meant that Jalen Hurts was able to feast. And boy oh boy did he feast. His pass to Devonta Smith, the first Alabama alum to score a td in the Super Bowl, was an absolute gem. The crossing route ball to AJ Brown hit him in stride. The “tush push” or “brotherly shove”, whatever the hell they call it, worked to perfection. He was able to scramble for big yards and had all the time in the world to scan the field when he stayed in the pocket. Hurts was masterful last night and he more than deserved the MVP. Barkley didn’t have a monster game, but his presence was more than enough to scare the Chiefs and screw up their defensive game plan. Brown and Smith did their job at wideout and the o line was brilliant.

The Eagles defense was also otherworldly last night. The d line got constant pressure. They seemed to be in the backfield all game. I think they had five sacks. The linebackers cleaned up any mess. And the secondary was on point. Cooper Dejean had a pick six. Quinyon Mitchell laid the wood all night and they were able to pick Mahoney twice and make him look very pedestrian. Their kick game was great and their special teams did the job. Total team effort.

The Chiefs, on the other hand, were terrible. The o line was dreadful. The receivers, except for Xavier Worthy, were middling. Travis Kelce looked old and slow. The run game was non existent. Patrick Mahomes was off all night. This may be the worst he’s played since he was a rookie. The defense tried to hang in as long as possible, but the second half proved to be their undoing. I don’t know what their mindset was coming into this game, but they looked woefully unprepared. Maybe the close games all year finally caught up to them. I don’t know. The three peat wasn’t in the cards. The Eagles were ready, the Chiefs we’re clearly not.

As for the halftime show, I loved it. I’m a humongous Kendrick Lamar fan and he delivered for me last night. I loved his song choices. I loved the whole performance. I thought it was great that he did “Not Like Us”, when it was reported that he was asked not to. I was all for the direct look to camera that is now a massive viral meme. Seeing Serena Williams dance with all the dancers was rad. SZA came out and crushed. I was all in on the halftime show.

The commercials were fine and vanished from my brain quick. I don’t remember the Clydesdale commercial. Nothing made me really laugh. Unless my dad was laughing, he has a contagious laugh, not one commercial made me laugh on my own. The movie trailers have all, for the most part, already been released. I paid more attention to them this year, but nothing was worth remembering for me.

All in all, the game was underwhelming. The right team won, so I guess that’s cool. I thought Kendrick Lamar and crew were great, and the commercials were middling. I’ll end this with giving the Eagles a much deserved congrats. They won and they won big. They stomped all over the Chiefs attempt to three-peat. Congrats on the win and enjoy the spotlight Philly. Well done.

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Ty Watches "Severance"

I fully understand that I'm late to all of this, but "Severance" is one hell of a tv show. I just started to watch the first season this week, and I have already seen all of season 1. I have watched half of the first episode of season 2, and I'm all in.

"Severance" isn't the freshest idea in the sci-fi world, but damned if it isn't one of the best written and acted shows. I find myself endlessly floored at the performances that the actors give. This is a whole new world for Adam Scott and he is absolutely nailing it. I always find it fascinating when an actor who is so entrenched in one genre, I'd say comedy for Scott, does something totally different. It shouldn't be a surprise, Adam Scott is a professional actor. But, going from a very joke heavy show like "Parks and Rec", to doing hard sci-fi like "Severance", this is an accomplishment from him. He does such a wonderful job. Britt Lower matches him punch for punch. She is rebellious and knows this whole world that this show has created is not good. She does a fantastic job, and the big twist with her at the end of season 1 makes her role that much more impressive. John Tutturo is in this show and he shows us all why he is one of the better actors working right now. The two versions of himself in the show couldn't be more different, but I find myself rooting for each one. There are scenes with him and Christopher Walken, another powerhouse performance, that are sweet and heartbreaking in one shot. The work the two of them do together is beautifully done, and Tutturo steals the show for me. Zach Cherry is the "comic relief", but he also does some heavy stuff here. I have always liked Cherry's work, but he is on another level in "Severance". I cannot wait to see what his character does in season 2. Outside the four main actors, Trammel Tillman is so menacing and nice and singularly focused on the task at hand. He has quickly become my favorite character in the show. Jen Tullock, as Scott's sister, and Michael Chernus, as Scott's brother in law, bring a realness and a grounding to this show that is a nice break. And Patricia Arquette is on a whole other level here. I realized watching this show that I had not seen much of her work. She is magnetic and outstanding in this show.

The writing takes this show to a different level as well. For a sci-fi series, the things that happen are easy enough to follow. The show isn't weird just for the sake of being weird. From what I've seen to this point, whenever something odd happens, it has a nice payoff. I like that questions get answered. When the actors deliver the written lines, I believe what they're saying is coming from their character's perspective. This show is so good on every single level. Even the way it is shot, it is cool to look at on my screen. Oh, and the opening credits sequence to season 1 is one of the coolest openings in tv history. I usually skip through the intro of a show, but not here. The music and the animation is so rad.

Look, "Severance" is a critically acclaimed show. It has been nominated I assume. I'm not telling you all anything new if you already watch the show. But if you don't, and you may be on the fence, watch it. It is so well done and so interesting and cool. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Thoughts on the NBA Trade Deadline

The NBA trade deadline ended about an hour ago. I’m not here to break down each trade. I don’t want to go through each one and talk about the good and the bad of the trade. Teams make deals, sometimes they work sometimes they don’t. This is life in the NBA. But this trade deadline has been, quite possibly, the craziest deadline of all time.

What makes it even wilder to me, none of the humongous names went today. They all went early. It all started when the bombshell Luka for AD trade happened. I wrote about that particular trade twice. I’m still shocked by it, and neither player has yet to play for their new team, but it certainly is real. They’ve had press conferences and everything. They’ve scrubbed their personal social media and made their own remarks. There’s no going back now. Outside that trade, De’Aaron Fox was also moved. I also talked about that one. That was a perfect deal for him and San Antonio. Jimmy Butler was traded to Golden State. I didn’t think he’d go there, and I’m not too high on that deal, but he got out of Miami, which is what he wanted. And outside having to move Andrew Wiggins, the Warriors didn’t have to give up much more. Khris Middleton and Kyle Kuzma swapped teams. My team, the Memphis Grizzlies, made a move. And a whole bunch of other stuff happened too.

What really sets this trade deadline apart is the star power, as I said before. The names I mentioned are perennial all stars and some are consistently in the conversation for MVP. A handful of former high lottery picks were moved. Players drafted in the late first round, who have carved out a niche for themselves in the NBA, are in new places as well. This NBA trade deadline is going to be hard to match. No other league has this type of player movement in the middle of a season. Destinies are going to be changed due to this deadline this season. Some teams have found a player that will be their cornerstone for years to come. Other contending teams seemed to have found the missing piece for a deep playoff run. This deadline was nuts. This type of movement is why I’m hesitant to buy my son jerseys of certain players. And a deadline like this proves that no one in this era of the NBA is safe. No matter how bright your star shines or how important some of these guys think they might be to their former team, if the brass wants to move on, they will. That’s a scary thought moving forward, but here we are.

Pro sports is entertainment and that was proven tenfold this past week. Now, I want to see how these players perform on their new squads. The second half of the NBA season will be very interesting. And I can’t wait.

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

Why I am Rooting Against The Chiefs

The other day I was hanging out with my folks. I go over there a few times a week to see them and have coffee with my dad. Before we go out I usually chat with both my parents. We were talking about the Super Bowl and my mom said something that has stuck with me since then.

My mom grew up in a home where her dad watched a good amount of football. She also raised four boys, three of us that played organized football, and I have to imagine her knowledge grew by sheer osmosis. My mom actually knows more than a lot of people about football. She also happens to be a Chiefs fan. To each their own. But, since she is a fan, she asked me the other day why everyone seems to dislike them now. This is the quote that has stuck with me. She brings up a good point. There are a ton of people that actively dislike the Chiefs. I happen to be one of those people. I feel like they get some kind of help from the officials and they have an arrogance towards them. They kind of walk around like they own the NFL, which they kind of do at this moment. But, after this conversation, me, my mom and my dad all kind of went through former teams that people seem to dislike.

I was a child of the 90's. Back then, people either loved or hated the Bulls and Cowboys. I didn't mind the Bulls, but boy oh boy do I still despise the Cowboys. And a lot of that had to do with the way they carried themselves. They acted better than everyone, again, which they were. The Cowboys won a bunch and set records. The Bulls were the same. They also happened to have the GOAT, Michael Jordan. They were always in the finals and they always won. They'd beat teams like the Magic or Rockets and that seemed to frustrate everyone that wasn't a fan. In the early 2000's the NFL had the Patriots dynasty. And when I saw a bunch of people disliked the Patriots, I guess a better way to describe it is, everyone outside of Boston and New England actively rooted against the Patriots. I was indifferent, but there were points where I found myself rooting for some of the teams they were playing. I have never been an Eagles fan, but when Donovan McNabb was their QB, I wanted nothing more than his team to beat the Patriots. I never rooted for the Rams when they were in STL, but when they had The Greatest Show on Turf, you're damn right I was frustrated when they got beat by the Patriots, thus starting their dynasty. And I will go to my grave believing Charles Woodson stripped Tom Brady and that the tuck rule is the dumbest rule in pro sports. I have to imagine a bunch of people in the 70's were sick of the Celtics and Steelers. Those teams were winning all the time and it had to bum non fans out. Currently in the sports world I find myself actively rooting against the Lakers, Dodgers and Yankees. The Lakers always seem to find a way to land a superstar. The Yankees buy players. And the Dodgers, well, I feel like they're ruining pro baseball based on the sheer fact that they can sign anyone they want whenever they want. Their lineup features Shoehei Ohtani, Freddie Freeman and Mookie Betts, among others. They signed the best pitching prospect in Japan recently. They also signed the top reliever on the market. I wouldn't be shocked if they win 140 games, and I find that this also bums me out.

The main thing all these teams seem to have in common, they're winning teams. They all have multiple titles and superstars that have rolled through their locker rooms. They have big names and big personalities. But, the main common thread, the main thing, the reason I believe that people actively dislike all the teams I mentioned, and now with the Chiefs, they win and most people like to root for the underdog. Sorry mom, but I'd much rather see the Eagles win the Super Bowl this year. I couldn't root for either team last year because the Chiefs and 49ers are my two least favorite teams in the NFL. I rooted for the Falcons when they gave up their 25 point lead. I also rooted for the Seahawks when Malcolm Butler picked off Russell Wilson at the one yard line. And I even rooted for Tampa Bay when they played the Chiefs in the COVID Super Bowl. Most people don't want to root for the favorite, and I believe that is the main reason why so many people are rooting for the Eagles this weekend. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

ESPN's Lakers Bias is Strong

Yesterday I wrote about the Luka-AD trade. I put out my thoughts on the whole thing. I figure both teams got some good and bad out of the whole deal. It's still odd to think about, but with press conferences and it all being official, we just have to see them play now for my eyes to fully believe it. But the reason I'm back today to talk about it one more time is all the stuff I read about this trade and the grades given out by supposed experts.

ESPN is usually the first site that gives out their grades from their writers. Other publications and sites follow up right away, but I usually only read ESPN. I don't like their content, but it's the quickest and it's the first one I tend to see. The Jazz, who I totally forgot were part of this deal, got a B. The Lakers were given an A. And the Mavs, a stone cold F.

I was a little stunned when I saw this. The Jazz grade didn't do much for me. Sure, they got a player, Jalen Hood Schifino, and some picks. That's what they want right now. The more picks the Jazz get, the better for them. And if a team can throw in a young, unproven player, they will most definitely give that person a shot. A B for them makes total sense to me. But the A for the Lakers and F for the Mavs is wild. The Lakers defense was already struggling with their best defender, AD. They were in the 20's. That's not great. LeBron can only do so much, as he is getting older. Jarred Vanderbilt struggles to stay healthy enough during the regular season, and has become borderline unplayable in the playoffs. Austin Reaves is a total zero on that end. Gabe Vincent seems like a one season wonder. Jaxson Hayes has never lived up to the high draft position. Dalton Knecht is not ready to play mid level NBA defense. Bronny James goes back and forth between the NBA and G League. Adding Luka Doncic will do good things for their offense, but he is going to pull this defense down even further. I saw a video of him "playing defense" the other night and it was abhorrent. His footwork is atrocious. He gets beat with ease. He is always calling and pointing for help. He cannot even keep guards out of the post anymore. This squad reminds me of a team that just wants to outscore everyone, but that will not happen. So, to give them an A is wild to me. I have to imagine it's because everyone at ESPN is in love with Doncic for some reason. They look past his poor defense and consistent whining. They only see the wild shots that fall and they have let everything else fly. That's irresponsible for a major network like them, but here we are. They will give a pass to anyone they seem to have a crush on.

An F for the Mavs is rough too. The love ESPN seems to have for Doncic, that is the same amount of hate and disdain they have for AD. They question everything that he does. They complain that he's "not as dominant" as he should be. They always talk about him being hurt. They mock his jumper. I don't get it. AD does get hurt and his jumper is gone, but the other stuff is nonsense. AD, when he plays, is very good. He is an upper tier low post defender. He can rebound the ball. He gets to the line a ton. He seems to be a solid teammate. And he's in shape. AD is a very good basketball player. He is one of the top forwards/centers in the league. When he plays, no matter what teams he is on, they seem to play well enough to be a thorn. While the trade may not be for everyone, an F seems like a wild overreach from the writers at ESPN. I just don't see how they can go to two different extremes when talking about two players in their prime. There has to be something else to this, but I cannot figure it out.

I don't agree or think these grades are fair or reliable. But, it figures a company like ESPN is only in it for the stars that they love, and clearly Anthony Davis is not one of them. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

Thoughts on the Luka Doncic Anthony Davis Trade

As I was drifting off to sleep the other night, my phone buzzed with a sports update. I usually don't pay much mind when this happens as I am going to sleep, but I just happened to be rolling over to get more comfortable and I saw my phone light up. So I checked and was shocked at the news. In fact, I thought it was a joke or some wrong reporting. I assumed it wasn't true at all to be honest with you all.

It was made official yesterday and I have seen a ton of reputable reporters confirming the story. So, it is true that Luka Doncic is now a Laker and Anthony Davis is a Maverick. There are some other players and picks in this trade, but Doncic and Davis are the story here. Again, writing it right now, it still doesn't seem real. I don't think it will sink in for me until I actually see them both play for their new teams. But, here we are. And with this being fully official, I have some thoughts.

I do have to say, this may be the biggest trade I've ever witnessed in my sports watching life. I have seen big names move, but there was some kind of caveat. Kawhi Leonard going to the Raptors was a one year rental. KD signed with the Warriors as a free agent, and did the same with the Nets. Hell, even his trade to the Suns wasn't as wild as this one. Back in the 90', when I first started to really watch the NBA, stuff like this didn't happen. I cannot pull one star for star player from that era. And if a guy changed teams, it was a free agent thing. There's a bunch of player movement in this new era, which is kind of cool. De'Aaron Fox was just traded to the Spurs. Zach Lavine was part of that deal. Paul George is a 76er, but that was free agency. And it seems like it's only a matter of time until Jimmy Butler is somewhere else. But this Luka for AD trade is otherworldly. I cannot wrap my head around all of this still, and it has been a couple of days. But pulling back and trying to gauge this, I do have some thoughts.

I am floored that both these teams gave up on guys who still seem to have a good amount left in the tank. I have my own personal issues with Luka Doncic. The way he plays the game of basketball bugs the hell out of me. He's a ball hog, unless he can hunt assists. He whines and complains so much that it has become a real problem. He picks and chooses when he wants to play defense, and when he decides he wants to play defense, he is a liability. He is a ball stopper and settles for far too many jumpers. His partying can be a problem and he seems to have issues with some of his teammates. But, the guy can put the ball in the basket. He is one of the better scorers in the NBA. Anthony Davis has some stuff too. He cannot stay healthy. He has been better about that lately, but all good things will come to an end. His jumper is nonexistent. He isn't as good a rebounder as someone his size should be. He is a little soft from time to time. But, he is an exceptional defender. He gets to the free throw line. And he knows how to win on the biggest stage.

When I try to figure out what Luka brings to the Lakers, I kind of come up empty. I am very, very curious to see how he meshes with LeBron. They both want the ball in their hands in crucial moments. LeBron has proven he is much better at this than Luka. The Lakers backcourt will now feature Doncic and Gabe Vincent. That doesn't move the needle much for me. Gabe Vincent's best days are behind him and Doncic is a zero defender. Austin Reaves and Dorian Finney-Smith, I guess, are the starting forwards. Again, Reeves is a zero defensively and Finney-Smith has never been able to recover his three point shot. At center they have Jaxson Hayes replacing AD. That is like hamburger replacing filet mignon. That's a major downgrade for the Lakers. As for the bench, who really cares. The Lakers will have massive defensive issues now. They also have a head coach that's in over his head. And LeBron hasn't said much about this, so who really knows how he feels about all of this.

As for AD to the Mavs, I actually like this more for them. It's going to be tough to replace Doncic's offense, maybe impossible, but they will have an incredible defense now. Kyrie Irving will take over as the main offensive threat, and this is okay. Irving is a fine scorer and a weird dude. Klay Thompson can shoot, but man oh man is he old. PJ Washington has been so much better since going to Dallas and Dereck Lively II is very young and very good. AD brings defense, a low post game and a winning pedigree. I don't know how long he will stay healthy, or if the Mavs will make more moves, but the fit with AD is so much better than the Luka fit on the Lakers for me. I guess time will tell.

This trade is colossal. Moves like this don't happen ever. Two stars don't get traded for each other unless they're way past their prime. These two aren't close to past their prime. Luka is still in his mid 20's, and AD is a young 30 or so year old with a ring. This is wild and I wonder if more big names will get moved in the next three days. But, no names will be as big as these names. This is a wild, wild trade. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

Fans Should Not Have a Say in All Star Voting

Yesterday I was looking at some sports news and the NBA all star reserves were being announced. Let’s discuss.

This is right around the time I start getting back into the NBA, right after all star break. The names were announced, and per usual, there were some surprises and some players that got "snubbed". I never pay much attention to the whole "snub" thing because there's only so many spots on an all star roster and some people are bound to be left off. It's the nature of the beast. And everyone has their opinion on who the biggest "snub" is and who they should replace. It is all being put out on social media immediately just for the clicks. And I don't have a fix for this issue per-say, but I have an idea on how some of this could be avoided in the near future.

My biggest issue with all star stuff, and this goes across multiple professional sports all star rosters, we have to stop letting the fan vote determine who the starters are going to be. I get it, you want the fans to feel involved. This gives them some kind of feeling of being in charge. We get to pick and we think we have some form of power, however slight it may be. The issue I have, fans vote for the same people year after year after year. And the fans that actually vote, they're a mix of small children or fully grown adults stuck in the past. No one who is of sound mind and maturity wastes their time voting for this. In the NBA the all star game is a joke, so why would a legit fan care to even vote? They wouldn't. It makes no sense. But, when I was a little kid, like 11 or 12, I couldn't wait to vote. I wanted to see the players I like play in an all star game. And that was all well and good back in the 90's because I couldn't watch Shawn Kemp, Chris Webber and Gary Payton whenever I wanted. We had no NBA on TNT or League Pass. We got the NBA on ABC, which was usually a Bulls game, and the occasional ESPN game, which were few and far between. So, the sheer fact that I could watch a player I like made me want to vote.

Kids now, like my son for example, are so bummed because Lamelo Ball isn't an all star this year. He loves watching Lamelo play. Me, I don't care about the Hornets and Lamelo plays zero defense, so I have no interest in watching him chuck the ball 25 times a game, if he is even playing. Some kids I coach were upset that Domantas Sabonis and Trae Young are not all stars. Again, these two play zero defense. Young jacks threes and hunts assists and Sabonis can rebound and score, but he is a liability in the post on defense. But I get the joy that they get from watching exciting players, I just don't think excitement lends to being an all star. And kids are dumb with sports stuff like all star rosters. I was dumb when it came to voting as a 12 or 13 year old, so I can relate to my son.

As for the fully grown adults voting, these are the ones voting for Nikola Jokic and Kevin Durant to be all star starters. This is why a guy like Dame Lillard is an all star every year. Steph and LeBron are all timers, but they don't need to waste their time playing in a pointless exhibition game. But the ESPN's and Fox Sports of the world will not have it any other way. These networks are star effers and they have an odd lust to see them play, even though they can watch them whenever they want. Jokic is a zero defensively. Durant is never healthy. Lillard is old and small and maybe the worst defender in the NBA. And, Steph and LeBron, as previously mentioned, don't need this.

I say do away with fan votes. It is a pointless waste of time. Fans will watch no matter what. My son is going to tune in simply because he loves the game of basketball. Others will tune in for their own reasons. But, if they want a legit all star game with legit rosters, go to the coaches with the caveat of no voting for anyone on your team. These people see these players night in and night out. They know the game better than any of us regular fans will ever know the game. Put it in their hands and go from there. Fans will still tune in, and I know that is what is important in this era of sports as entertainment. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

James Mangold Makes Movies for All the Adults in a Family to Enjoy

Earlier today I heard a comedy writer I like say something that I found to be pretty profound. He and one of his other podcast hosts were talking about "A Complete Unknown". Sean Clements said he liked it, and then he dropped one of the better quotes I've ever heard. He said some form of, "I hope James Mangold continues to make movies that me and my folks like". I couldn't agree more.

I also recently saw "A Complete Unknown", with my mom I might add, and I liked it quite a bit. You can go read my blog about the movie on the site. My mom loved it too. When we drove home we talked about all the things we liked about the movie. My biggest takeaway was the direction. The movie had a nice flow, the music scenes were shot beautifully and the actors seemed to understand the assignment. I credit a good portion of all of this to the director.

After hearing Clements comment, and thinking about my personal experience with "A Complete Unknown", it got me thinking. Now, my favorite Mangold movie is "Logan". This is not one for my mom, but my dad may like it if he ever watched it. I think it is the best version of how brutal and violent a mutant like Wolverine can be. I also think the idea of making more of these mutants in a lab and how rough and wrong that is was a nice touch. He also gets a tremendous performance from Hugh Jackman and Patrick Stewart. Those two are dynamic actors, but he got the best out of them. But the performance he pulled from Stephen Merchant was a stroke of genius. I only knew Merchant from comedy movies and shows, but he pulled off one of the better dramatic performances I've seen. It was a masterful job from Mangold getting that out of Merchant.

I did some more diving into his movies this afternoon, I found even more movies that fit into the genre of me and my folks having a good time. "Ford Vs Ferrari" has no right being as entertaining as it is. I had zero expectations going into that movie and it was great. "Walk the Line" kind of started the resurgence in these movie biopics. That is a Mangold directed movie as well. He got Oscar worthy performances out of Joaquin Phoenix and Reese Witherspoon. He helped those two become even bigger stars. Phoenix became Johnny Cash. Reese Witherspoon was dynamic as June Carter. That movie is special and important to many, many people. Hell, without "Walk the Line" we would have never gotten "Walk Hard: The Dewey Cox Story". Mangold also directed "The Wolverine". This was the follow up to "X-Men Origins: Wolverine". "The Wolverine" was going to be better no matter what, but it actually revitalized that character in my opinion. "Knight and Day" is a fun movie with star power. Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz have wonderful chemistry and they make this formulaic movie kind of worth watching. And the remake of "3:10 to Yuma" is a great action western. That movie made me want to watch some older westerns because of how much I liked it.

The one thing that all these movies have in common with my liking of them, the ones my folks have seen seem to enjoy them as well. James Mangold makes non threatening movies that the whole family will enjoy. The cliche works here and works like a charm. I'm curious to see what Mangold does next, but whatever it may be, I bet my folks and I will really enjoy talking about it afterwards. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

Thoughts on Where De'Aaron Fox Should Play Next

It looks like De'Aaron Fox wants a change of scenery. I read that the Kings have decided to field calls for a possible trade, and that Fox and his agent think this is the best path moving forward. Let’s discuss.

I don't get why the Kings continue to do stuff like this. They offloaded Tyrese Haliburton way too quickly. They let guys walk all the time. They take chances on draft picks and they usually don't pay off. Davion Mitchell is gone. Haliburton, as mentioned, is gone. Keegan Murray came out of the gates super fast, but he has since cooled off. The Kings get a little success and then they decide it's time to make a change. Fox seemed like the perfect cornerstone player to build around. He has come into his own and has led the Kings to two consecutive playoff appearances. He seems to like playing in Sacramento. But, for some reason he is now most likely out the door. I read today that the Kings want a good return, as they should. But, I'm still a little stunned that they are both ready to move on so fast from one another.

I also read about some of the teams on his "preferred" list, and also about the ones that didn't make the cut. I always chuckle a little when I read about the teams that didn't make the list. The Lakers are one of the teams not on the list. That makes perfect sense. They have nothing in the way of picks or the talent the Kings want in return. But, to keep up their image, the media cannot just say that, they have to put a shine on it. In fact, the Lakers are the only team that I've read about to this point that are not on his list. In fact I saw that "dozens" of teams have made contact with the Kings in regards to a possible trade. The most likely outcome, in my opinion and many others as well, there are four real possibilities, the Nets, Magic, Heat and Spurs, with the Spurs being Fox's preferred destination.

With the Nets, this comes down to money and an extension. If that is what Fox is after, the biggest payday, this would be his best bet. I don't know how this would help the Kings other than draft assets. The Nets have tons of picks to trade. In regards to "win now" players, that is the issue. They have Cam Johnson and Cam Thomas. Those guys are solid, but they are not on Fox's level. You could throw Nic Claxton in there, but the Kings already have enough bigs. If the Nets were to pursue a trade, this would be about getting the biggest payday possible for Fox.

I kind of like the fit with the Magic. The Magic would have to give up on players like Gary Harris or Anthony Black, or both. The Kings will want to try and replace Fox with many guards instead of just one. They could bring in those guards, shoot for some of the Magic's bench players, maybe Johnathan Issac or Mo Wagner. And the Magic could trade some future picks as well, If Fox were to join the Magic with Paolo Banchero and Franz Wagner, they'd have three really good, really young guys that make them instant contenders in the East. But, this only works if the Kings are okay with taking late first round picks.

The Heat are an interesting team here. This would have to be a multiple team trade, but it is intriguing. If the Kings and Heat could get Phoenix or Milwaukee involved, that could make this wacky. Jimmy Butler could get his wish and wind up in Phoenix. The Suns would have to offload a bunch of the mid level guys they signed to pair with KD and Devin Booker, but I'm sure they'd jump at the chance. The Heat could then end up with Fox or Bradley Beal in this deal, but where does that leave the Kings? What do they get out of this trade? The Heat always pick late in the first round. So do the Suns. As for players, the mid level guys from the Suns are okay, but not playoff worthy players. The Heat always seem to have players that are successful for them, but that isn't always the case when they leave Miami. This trade only really benefits Jimmy Butler. De'Aaron Fox should be the focal point of any deal when he is involved.

Finally we have the Spurs. This one is the best fit and makes the most sense. Pairing Victor Webanyama with Fox would be wonderful. Chris Paul has been nice to have around Wemby, but Fox is younger and more on Wemby's timeline. They should fit like an absolute glove. In this deal, if the Kings want "win now" guys, they could get CP3 in this deal, and probably even guys like Malaki Branham or Keldon Johnson. The Spurs also have a ton of picks they can deal. The Kings could get a big name, some young names with real potential and picks. The Spurs get the ideal fit at point guard with Fox and Wemby is happy because they are on a faster track to compete. I love this trade for both teams. Now, will this actually happen, who knows.

The trade deadline is February 6th. That is about a week away. A lot is going to have to happen between now and then, but it could get done, and I think it will get done. This seems like it has been in the works for a bit and it is just a matter of time before it is announced. Time will tell, but I'm interested to see how it all shakes out. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing, the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast, and the greatest basketball writer on the internet.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

Thoughts on One More Season of "The Righteous Gemstones"

It was just announced that the fourth season of "The Righteous Gemstones" would be its last. This makes me happy and sad. Let’s discuss.

I'm happy because we get another season of this great show. "The Righteous Gemstones" is one of the funniest shows currently on tv. It always amazes me how funny and excellent the show can be with each new episode and each new season. I don't know why I would ever doubt it either. When David Gordon and Danny McBride work together, especially on an HBO show, they seem to hit every single time. "Eastbound and Down" is a true classic. That show will stand the test of time. I would not doubt my son watching it when he's older. "Vice Principals" is criminally underrated. This is a dark comedy that succeeds at every level. I wish more people knew of this show. It is amazing. And now, with "The Righteous Gemstones" they've found the perfect vehicle to skewer these mega churches and their tv shows and obnoxiously big churches. McBride is allowed to be his true self in these shows and he goes for it. It is a thing of beauty to watch. McBride is a gifted comedic actor, and when he can go a bit dark, man is it fun.

These two have also created some excellent side characters. Stevie is a gem. I mean, that actor shined in this role and I loved watching him get weirder and weirder. Walton Goggins as McBride's foil in "Vice Principals" is a work of art. He is so foul and mean and hilarious. This was my first experience seeing Goggins act and I became an instant fan. And now we have the Gemstone family and Keif. These guys know how to write these characters and how to make them shine. Judy Gemstone is one of my all time favorite tv characters. I adore BJ in this show. John Goodman truly shines as the father of the family. I mean, it is damn near perfect. Seeing these two do their thing is such a fun time for me. I have also thoroughly enjoyed every season of the three shows they've created for HBO. They are shows I go back to quite frequently, and I'm sure that will continue to be the case for years to come.

The news that they've decided to stop making more after this season, that bums me out. This is my only quibble with Green and McBride creations. They end shows after four or five seasons. They get in and get out. I get it, they don't want to wear out their welcome. But, even a show like the American version of "The Office" gave us nine seasons. "Brooklyn 99" gave us seven. "30 Rock" was also seven, I believe. These Green and McBride shows seem to never go any further than four seasons. I want to see more and more of the Gemstone family and all their issues. I'd love to have seen what Goggins and McBride did once they got the principal job. I thought the idea of Kenny Powers being on a tv sports talk show was perfect. They can do more and more with these characters, but maybe they get sick and tired after four full seasons of writing. I'm sure it can be frustrating for them because I assume they're perfectionists. And I just want to watch more and more because I tend to allow myself to get attached to these fictional people. I understand that this is the way of tv in this era. I'm sure creators want to get in and out and go to the next project. But, I'd like to get to know everyone a little better. I miss when shows would go eight or nine seasons. I know it can get stale, but sometimes shows can really crush it in the later years.

With all this being said, at least we get one more season of "The Righteous Gemstones", and I'm happy as can be for that. That show is great and I'm interested to see how it all ends up. 

Ty
Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.

I Guess I Should Do a Super Bowl Preview

Well, we have a pretty dull Super Bowl match up, in my opinion. This is a rematch too. The Eagles easily dismissed the Commanders and the Chiefs found a way to defeat the Bills once again. The NFC title game was such a blowout that I fell asleep watching it. That game actually pushed my run back a few hours because I was so bored that I was dozing. The Chiefs got some help from the refs and the Bills acted like themselves in the end to find a way to blow a possible win and trip to the Super Bowl. I will say, the Chiefs played well too. They did get help from the refs, but they also earned the win.

So, if I were to sit here today and write a preview, I don't really know what to do. These are the two best teams in the NFL. The Lions got beat earlier than they should have, the Bills blew it and the Ravens also blew it. The Eagles won with stifling defense and an exceptional run game. The Chiefs did it with their defense, and Mahomes deciding he was going to become mobile again. I think the Eagles and Chiefs match up pretty well against one another. The Chiefs defense is the best part of their team, but the Eagles have an elite run game. The Eagles also have two very solid corners, but they are both rookies. The Chiefs have names, guys like Travis Kelce and Deandre Hopkins, but they aren't the players they once were. The Eagles front seven on defense is pretty damn good too. But, so do the Chiefs. The coaching here goes to KC, but the Eagles have found a way to win despite some early season locker room issues. And the Chiefs are coming off two straight Super Bowl wins. They have the experience. One of those wins came against Philly, but the Eagles have changed their team since then.

If I were to go through certain aspects of the game, I come out with no real advantage that stands out. The Chiefs have Mahomes. He is a proven winner. Jalen Hurts is very good and can do some special things, but he is not Mahomes. The Eagles run game is far superior. Saquon Barkley is a legit MVP candidate, he put up over 2,000 yards this season and is a threat whenever he has the ball in his hands. The Chiefs have a running back by committee, which is fine, but it is not Barkley. The Eagles have better receivers. AJ Brown and Devonta Smith are much more reliable than Hopkins or Smith Schuster. The Eagles do have a way better tight end. Kelce is one of the better tight ends in the NFL. The Eagles o-line is better, but the Chiefs o-line gets away with way more than any other line in the league. The d-lines kind of cancel each other out. I could say the same about the linebackers. But, the Eagles secondary is more youthful, and dare I say, better. Trent McDuffie is really, really good, but Cooper DeJean and Quinyon Mitchell already look better. So, when I really break it down and think about it, the Eagles have the better team in my opinion. They have a better run game, a better overall unit on defense and an elite o-line. But, the Chiefs have Mahomes and Kelce and Andy Reid. They also have the refs and a good portion of the country on their side. A lot of people want to see this 3-peat. The Chiefs are this generations Patriots. They get the calls when they needs the calls. They make the plays when they need to make the plays. And they have prior experience being on this stage and winning it all.

With that being said, I think the Chiefs are going to win. I am going to watch because I watch every Super Bowl, but this year may be more about the commercials and food for me. Oh well, it is what it is. 

Ty

Ty is the Pop Culture editor for SeedSing and the other host of the X Millennial Man Podcast.

Come and support Ty and the podcast on Patreon.

Follow Ty on instagram.

SeedSing is funded by a group of awesome people. Join them by donating to SeedSing.